10 Days in the USA

This is another game we got from Geppettos.  10 Days in the USA has a big game board map of the USA, a deck of cards and some plastic holders for organizing player hands and discard piles.  The goal is simple: to build a 10-card trip across the country.

Most of the cards are states, including Alaska & Hawaii.  Other cards include cars that let you skip a state, and planes that let you jump to any state of the same color.  Note that the color of the plane must match the card before and after it, so you can't use a red card to hop between green states.  Side note: any color plane can get to Hawaii or Alaska.


We do like rules-light games and that's about all the rules to be found here, except for one rule about how the travel in the four corners area.  You draw a card each turn, replace one of the cards in your rack, and discard one.  Once a card is in your rack you cannot move it.

Actual gameplay was moderately frustrating for Anne, and like usual with any game with geography, I kept being asked to show where the states were.  That's fine, happy to help, but it does give away what cards the other player has.

We found that the trips do start to come together up after 8 to 10 draws, and it was mildly entertaining to have the feel of trying to plan actual road trips -- the flights never seem to go exactly where you want to go.  But toward the end, it drags because we are each looking for one or two cards to complete the trip.  Also, if I get all the way from California to Maryland in just 9 cards, that really should count as a completed trip.  Instead, I have to keep pulling cards until I get a neighboring state ... and those might have all been discarded much earlier in the game.  To fix this, or speed up the drag for two players, maybe allow a shorter trip, or let the trip end with a car card, because you made it across the country and then went for a drive.  But what if the only remaining card cards have also been buried in a discard pile?

I was a bit surprised that, considering the size of the game board, you never put any tokens on the board.  The only use of the board, other than seeing how the states are connected, is putting the trips in the #1-10 card spaces at the bottom, so all players can review it.  With two player, we can just tilt the card holders to see the trip -- no need to move cards at all.  I think it would be interesting to put colored chips on the states I have traveled to, for some added tension, and it would be nice to know that Ohio is not available.  But then you would have to keep updating your chips when your trip changes.

It feels like the game is missing something.  The big empty game board doesn't feel right.  It would be good if there was a way to earn a token every now and then, and then spend a token to swap two cards in your tray.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ancient Games Book

Image
I had a former coworker contact me to say her mom had a weird book of old games, so we met up, and it turned out to be the classic Irving Finkel "Ancient Board Games" produced by the British Museum.  Dr. Finkel is a leading expert on ancient board games, and the book covers four classics: Senet, Mehen, Hounds an Jackals and the Royal Game of Ur.  The Royal Game of Ur is one of our favorites from this era, and was one of the first games I covered in this blog series.  I was familiar with the others, but never had a decent board to play on. The book comes with a little plastic tray with four throwing sticks and 8 playing pieces for each of two colors.  In each set, one piece is larger than the others, being the "lion" in the Mehen game. After dabbling with these games for about 45 minutes, we kept having problems picking up the perfectly smooth throwing sticks, and there was no clear distinction between the flat side and rounded side, aside from the subtle shape.  So
Read more

Hounds and Jackals

Image
Continuing with the book of ancient board games, the Hounds and Jackal board is gorgeous.  Every painted crack or chip in the supposedly wooden surface added character.  The original artifacts had holes in the board, and the pieces were little carvings of hounds and jackals on pegs.  Moving chips around the board was good enough to get the feel of it.  It's a simple race game, trying to get your pieces to the top of tree and off the board first.  There were no tricky rules for the throwing sticks.  You roll, you move. Since there were a few spaces with "slides", it's hard to not feel like you're playing a scaled down Snakes & Ladders game.  Some of these game ideas really do span most of human history.  There are also a few spaces with a little cross on them, where you roll again if you land there. The game was simple, and only took about 10 minutes.  This one had the most interesting set of variations discussed on the back page, since different boards have be
Read more

My Only Scrabble Tournament

Image
Here is something that popped into my head randomly while trying to sleep last night ... Back in the late 90's, I was in my one and only Scrabble tournament.  It was a local fundraiser at the Escondido Public Library.  My wife-at-the-time was on my team, and two close friends were a couple on another team.  There were about 30 players, and our entry fees went to a literacy charity. I won a few rounds, and as I recall I made it to the round where there were only 2 games being played.  So if there were 32 players to start, round two would be 16, round three would be 8, round four would be those two games.  That all adds up (in my head). My fresh opponent started by saying, "Let's not add up the scores each round, so we can focus on the game.  It's such a hassle." I didn't know if there was an actual rule against doing that, but I figured I could ignore the total score.  Why should those numbers affect my choice of words anyway? In the end, we did add our scores,
Read more